Talk:Ructions: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
(PLEASE GIVE YOUR OPINIONS if you were in YSTV at the time!!)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I have judged that quoting emails is the best way to give an impartial account, as written records are the only solid thing we have. However, Jonathan argues that this may not be wise as it could come across as a bit of a character assasination. I see his point, but am not sure whether I agree or not. Opinions would be greatly appreciated!!!
I have judged that quoting emails is the best way to give an impartial account, as written records are the only solid thing we have. However, Jonathan argues that this may not be wise as it could come across as a bit of a character assasination. I see his point, but am not sure whether I agree or not. Opinions would be greatly appreciated!!!
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 16:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 16:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
For those of us interested in the events, this full account is brilliant. However, for those newer to the society, they may not be so bothered by the blow-by-blow... but then again, how do you simplify it without making it sound even worse? What we've got at the moment is an accurate account of the event (I trust!), which might be better than cutting it down and making it biased. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 16:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
0

edits

Navigation menu