JVC SVHS: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
24 bytes removed ,  31 May 2007
m
no edit summary
m (making the case for buying PRO gear)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
During the latter half of 1994, the [[Panasonic MS4]] was coming under heavy use in the field, in the studio and for dumping down to the Umatic. At times these rolls were competing and in some cases to the detriment of the camera. In order to save the tape mechanism, it was decided to look for a SVHS recorder. In January 1995, [[Owain Davies]] pitched the PRO entry level JVC SVHS machine to the station, in a style not too dissimilar, as some people commented at the time, to a double glazing salesman. The JVC SVHS was not a cheap option (in excess of 1000 pounds), however it would hopefully save the life of the MS4's mechanics and allow programmes to be archived with minimal degradation, while also offering a long lifetime befitting a piece of PRO equipment.
During the latter half of 1994, the [[Panasonic MS4]] was coming under heavy use in the field, in the studio and for dumping down to the Umatic. At times these roles were competing and in some cases to the detriment of the camera. In order to save the tape mechanism, it was decided to look for a SVHS recorder. In January 1995, [[Owain Davies]] pitched the PRO entry level JVC SVHS machine to the station, in a manner, as some people commented at the time, to a double glazing salesman. The JVC SVHS was not a cheap option (in excess of 1000 pounds), however it was hoped save the life of the MS4's mechanics and allow programmes to be archived with minimal degradation, while also offering a long lifetime befitting a piece of PRO equipment.


The machine saw good service, and it's light weight allowed it to form part of the [[two camera cable]] system.
The machine saw good service, and it's light weight allowed it to form part of the [[two camera cable]] system.
0

edits

Navigation menu