JVC SVHS: Difference between revisions
Dummy User (talk | contribs) (adding a bit on the JVC SVHS) |
Dummy User (talk | contribs) m (minor typos) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
During the latter half of 1994, the [[Panasonic MS4]] was coming under heavy use | During the latter half of 1994, the [[Panasonic MS4]] was coming under heavy use in the field, in the studio and for dumping down to the Umatic. At times these rolls were competing and in some cases to the detriment of the camera. In order to save the tape mechanism, it was decided to look for a SVHS recorder. In January 1995, [[Owain Davies]] pitched the PRO entry level JVC SVHS machine to the station, in a style not too dissimilar, as some people commented at the time, to a double glazing salesman. The JVC SVHS was not a cheap option (in excess of 1000 pounds), however it would hopefully save the life of the MS4's mechanics and allow programmes to be archived with minimal degradation. | ||
The machine saw good service, and it's light weight allowed it to form part of the [[two camera cable]] system. | The machine saw good service, and it's light weight allowed it to form part of the [[two camera cable]] system. | ||
Revision as of 21:32, 31 May 2007
During the latter half of 1994, the Panasonic MS4 was coming under heavy use in the field, in the studio and for dumping down to the Umatic. At times these rolls were competing and in some cases to the detriment of the camera. In order to save the tape mechanism, it was decided to look for a SVHS recorder. In January 1995, Owain Davies pitched the PRO entry level JVC SVHS machine to the station, in a style not too dissimilar, as some people commented at the time, to a double glazing salesman. The JVC SVHS was not a cheap option (in excess of 1000 pounds), however it would hopefully save the life of the MS4's mechanics and allow programmes to be archived with minimal degradation.
The machine saw good service, and it's light weight allowed it to form part of the two camera cable system.