Talk:YSTV People

Page Structure

I'd be inclined not to start listing every officership throughout the past 40 years... it'd get a bit unwieldy. Rick 18:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I see what you're saying, but I do think it would be a nice record. Maybe split into separate pages for each officership? Rowan

Yes, separate pages makes more sense! Rick 18:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Can the 'People' A-Z page go here instead of the Station Director List? Kate 21:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Your wish is my command (maybe) Richardash1981 21:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Cheers me dears Kate 21:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Would it make more sense for the A-Z to be the first thing you see on the People page? The Honorary Members at the top, although perfectly valid, feels a bit confusing... Kate 21:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Going through the minutes in the documents folder...

I'm finding a few grey areas I'm afraid - the '02 & '04 AGMs are missing, and we have a total of 5 minutes for 2001! Rick 11:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Wouldn't have happened in my day... This Wiki is ace! All should know of it! Vanky 13:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

What time of year is the AGM? I'm trying to put together the list of all the jobs I did in YSTV, but can't quite make them fit... I was Station Engineer in my first year (99-00) and became Technical Director at some point. Then after the Big Constitutional Reorganisation (a small panel of us re-wrote the constitution from fresh, creating the present team structure - I actually wrote most of the text - that was in 2001, I think) I was the first Commercial Director. Then I was Studio Manager and then Training Manager. MichaelP-J 12:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

It's mid-May at the moment, and from the minutes folder, appears to have been that way since at least '98. Rick 12:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, that makes sense. There were, of course, many occasions during which people resigned in midterm - I'll try and remember some of these. MichaelP-J 16:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

2004 is missing because Matthew (David) Platts did them! Kate 21:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Ordering of Dates

My preference is to have things ordered in descending chronological ordering, since we're always going to have better + more data for the recent years, and it's easier to see new things at the top... what are people's opinions? We need to have a consistent look I think... --Matthew Tole 13:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree mostly, but I think leaving the older sections at the top would be better in this case - after all, it's the HistoryWiki, not PresentWiki. It'll bring the gaps in information to people's attention more. Hopefully. Rick 16:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)