14
edits
Talk:YSTV People: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Dummy User (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Yes, separate pages makes more sense! [[User:Rick|Rick]] 18:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | Yes, separate pages makes more sense! [[User:Rick|Rick]] 18:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Can the 'People' A-Z page go here instead of the Station Director List? [[User:Kate|Kate]] 21:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Your wish is my command (maybe) [[User:Richardash1981|Richardash1981]] 21:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Cheers me dears [[User:Kate|Kate]] 21:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Would it make more sense for the A-Z to be the first thing you see on the People page? The Honorary Members at the top, although perfectly valid, feels a bit confusing... [[User:Kate|Kate]] 21:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Can't do, I'm afraid. The A-Z is generated by the wiki, based on pages listed as part of the category "People". It can only be shown on that page. Technically we can edit the header of the category page, but then the A-Z would still be at the bottom. I've added a link to the page, best I can do for now I'm afraid. Oh, and the Honorary Members have been moved down again, as it does make more sense to have the officers above IMHO. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 22:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
No worries - that's definitely the clearest layout IMHO too - great stuff! [[User:Kate|Kate]] 09:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Yeah, I don't think having the full listing as the people page is a good idea. What it looks like now is nice. [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 11:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Going through the minutes in the documents folder... == | == Going through the minutes in the documents folder... == | ||
I'm finding a few grey areas I'm afraid - the '02 & '04 AGMs are missing, and we have a total of '''5''' minutes for 2001! | I'm finding a few grey areas I'm afraid - the '02 & '04 AGMs are missing, and we have a total of '''5''' minutes for 2001! | ||
[[User:Rick|Rick]] 11:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Rick|Rick]] 11:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Wouldn't have happened in my day... This Wiki is ace! All should know of it! [[User:Vanky|Vanky]] 13:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | Wouldn't have happened in my day... This Wiki is ace! All should know of it! [[User:Vanky|Vanky]] 13:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 32: | ||
It's mid-May at the moment, and from the minutes folder, appears to have been that way since at least '98. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 12:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | It's mid-May at the moment, and from the minutes folder, appears to have been that way since at least '98. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 12:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Okay, that makes sense. There were, of course, many occasions during which people resigned in midterm - I'll try and remember some of these. [[User:MichaelP-J|MichaelP-J]] 16:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
2004 is missing because Matthew (David) Platts did them! [[User:Kate|Kate]] 21:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Ordering of Dates == | == Ordering of Dates == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 41: | ||
I agree mostly, but I think leaving the older sections at the top would be better in this case - after all, it's the HistoryWiki, not PresentWiki. It'll bring the gaps in information to people's attention more. Hopefully. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 16:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | I agree mostly, but I think leaving the older sections at the top would be better in this case - after all, it's the HistoryWiki, not PresentWiki. It'll bring the gaps in information to people's attention more. Hopefully. [[User:Rick|Rick]] 16:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Dates == | |||
Some of the pages, notably Rowan's, list officerships by year for periods that are in fact less than a year. Given this, the dates 2005-2005 aren't particuarly helpful. Might I suggest a more specific timeline in these cases? -- [[User:Damian|Damian]] 03:08, 24 April 2007 (BST) | |||
== Honorary Members == | |||
There are far more honorary members than the two listed on this page, when I started it was practice to make all active members who'd just graduated honorary members (although as now it amounts to little other than a title). I think the last time we did this was 2003, didn't bother in 2004 as hardly anyone left so it didn't occur to us. But there's more than Greg Dyke and a baby! If someone can dig out the relavent minutes (usually first of the academic year) we could find out... [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 13:37, 25 April 2007 (BST) | |||