0
edits
Talk:James Flinders: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Dummy User (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dummy User (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Agreed. Whatever the reasons that were given in the EGM is reasonable to put here. We've got enough of us that weren't involved to be impartial and make sure you're only giving facts :-) [[User:Rick|Rick]] 23:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | Agreed. Whatever the reasons that were given in the EGM is reasonable to put here. We've got enough of us that weren't involved to be impartial and make sure you're only giving facts :-) [[User:Rick|Rick]] 23:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
OK, how about this... Add basic factual info to the James Flinders page, as suggested. Then later (after elections, and when I have some time) I'll write a separate page about the whole debacle, as one of the few people around who were there. Obviously others can keep an eye on my neutrality (and those that were there add to the info) but we can mark the page as a bit contentious. That seem reasonable? [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 10:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||