Talk:Grapevine Managers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dummy User (talk | contribs) m (New page: I thought it was re-branded inform before 2005? I _thought_ the grapevine name was gone before I arrived in 2003... am I wrong? ~~~~ Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better...) |
Dummy User (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought it was re-branded inform before 2005? I _thought_ the grapevine name was gone before I arrived in 2003... am I wrong? | I thought it was re-branded inform before 2005? I _thought_ the grapevine name was gone before I arrived in 2003... am I wrong? | ||
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Err... we used the name Inform for the PHP-based system that Kevin Bowman wrote, which replaced the earlier Windows 3.1-on-a-386 software sometime in 2003, I think. | |||
Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better on the grapevine page, rather than the grapevine managers page? | Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better on the grapevine page, rather than the grapevine managers page? | ||
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:03, 26 February 2007
I thought it was re-branded inform before 2005? I _thought_ the grapevine name was gone before I arrived in 2003... am I wrong? Rowan 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Err... we used the name Inform for the PHP-based system that Kevin Bowman wrote, which replaced the earlier Windows 3.1-on-a-386 software sometime in 2003, I think.
Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better on the grapevine page, rather than the grapevine managers page? Rowan 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)