Talk:Ructions: Difference between revisions

1,389 bytes added ,  15 November 2007
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


Good point! Could you look into that?? Pretty please? Make a database backup first though! Oops, you're not Tole... ;) Sorry Tole! [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 17:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Good point! Could you look into that?? Pretty please? Make a database backup first though! Oops, you're not Tole... ;) Sorry Tole! [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 17:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Bloody hell, 3rd time trying to post this but people keep getting in before me and it says I can't!
I wasn't concerned about the emails per se (although Kate makes a good point about the personal side of it), just the level of detail which seems a bit excessive and could be seen as a bit personal towards James. One of the things he was concerned about the most was his name being "sullied" on campus in his future endeavours if it made it into the papers (although as he later proved at Halifax he was perfectly capable of doing that himself what with all the "president" nonsense). However with jobs etc it does become a bit more problematic. I'm sure it'd be possible to summarise each event more consicely (whilst still keeping the key nature of each dispute in so as to demonstrate how we all got pissed off so quickly, such as standing up in the station meeting so it was quicker in return for drinks - remember that?) and I'd be happy to do that myself if the page was unlocked. Also to save him a bit of face the title "Criticism of Richard Ash" is a bit strong and seems to be covering a fairly minor point thgat at least doesn't deserve it's own section.
I'm not knocking the effort you're putting in Rowan - I think we can all say we appreciate the effort you're giving this! (even if most of us should be working...) [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 17:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
14

edits