Talk:James Flinders: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:


OK, how about this... Add basic factual info to the James Flinders page, as suggested. Then later (after elections, and when I have some time) I'll write a separate page about the whole debacle, as one of the few people around who were there. Obviously others can keep an eye on my neutrality (and those that were there add to the info) but we can mark the page as a bit contentious. That seem reasonable? [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 10:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
OK, how about this... Add basic factual info to the James Flinders page, as suggested. Then later (after elections, and when I have some time) I'll write a separate page about the whole debacle, as one of the few people around who were there. Obviously others can keep an eye on my neutrality (and those that were there add to the info) but we can mark the page as a bit contentious. That seem reasonable? [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 10:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I look forward to reading your full page on it but I do worry whether it's really what the wiki should be for...I know it is a long time ago, but it wasn't a particularly nice period and I wonder whether it needs documenting other than the line I suggested. [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 10:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
14

edits