Talk:Grapevine Managers: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better on the grapevine page, rather than the grapevine managers page?
Also, would the stuff about the introduction be better on the grapevine page, rather than the grapevine managers page?
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 15:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
It was decided to start referring to Grapevine as Inform at the start of 2003/4 - regardless of the origin of the name it was just felt to be a better representation of what the service was, and no-one seemed to object (not that there were many people around then to object) so it stuck.  There's definitely room for a piece somewhere on how the system changed over the years, but in terms of the point we changed from "Grapevine" to "Inform" it was simply changing the way we referred to it rather than anything else operationally.  [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 16:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
14

edits