0
edits
Ructions: Difference between revisions
added note about the constitutional ammendment, which was in fact failed for rewording
Dummy User (talk | contribs) m (Unprotected "Ructions") |
Dummy User (talk | contribs) (added note about the constitutional ammendment, which was in fact failed for rewording) |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
===Constitutional Ammendment=== | ===Constitutional Ammendment=== | ||
Following James' comments about the constitution being unclear on the decision making process (and the disagreement by some with his interpretatation was that he should make major decisions), Richard proposed an ammendment to the constitution to clarify matters. His intention appeared to be simply to avoid problems in the future (''my aim is to clarify the future not to try and rake over the past''), however it may have been seen by James and others as a direct response to the arguments taking place at the time. This was proposed and | Following James' comments about the constitution being unclear on the decision making process (and the disagreement by some with his interpretatation was that he should make major decisions), Richard proposed an ammendment to the constitution to clarify matters. His intention appeared to be simply to avoid problems in the future (''my aim is to clarify the future not to try and rake over the past''), however it may have been seen by James and others as a direct response to the arguments taking place at the time. This was proposed and failed because of questions over the wording of the amendment. It was agreed to correct these and return to the matter as most agreed some clarification was needed in the constitution on this matter, but other events overtook it, and the matter never needed to be re-visited. The long debate in the meeting over this may however have triggered some of the subsequent saga over meeting lengths. | ||
===Meeting Length=== | ===Meeting Length=== | ||