Talk:James Flinders: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dummy User (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We need to be careful to be factual, or at least to clearly mark anything which is opinion (seems fair as long as it is marked - what do people think?) Waiting until after elections might be courteous.(sp?) [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 16:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | We need to be careful to be factual, or at least to clearly mark anything which is opinion (seems fair as long as it is marked - what do people think?) Waiting until after elections might be courteous.(sp?) [[User:Rowan|Rowan]] 16:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Three years on surely we can say something like "due to disagreements over his leadership style he was no confidenced after a month as Station Director" or similar? It's about as factual as you can get [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 17:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:02, 6 March 2007
Thought I'd have a go at this page...2004 people - how can we put why he stopped being SD? I did put a line in that explained why but didn't go into detail, but is it best not to mention it? Or at least until after the elections? Jonathan 11:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
We need to be careful to be factual, or at least to clearly mark anything which is opinion (seems fair as long as it is marked - what do people think?) Waiting until after elections might be courteous.(sp?) Rowan 16:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Three years on surely we can say something like "due to disagreements over his leadership style he was no confidenced after a month as Station Director" or similar? It's about as factual as you can get Jonathan 17:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)