Vision - Revision history

Samw: Add category

2017-05-11T17:46:10Z

Add category

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 11 May 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	http://www.yorkvision.co.uk/		http://www.yorkvision.co.uk/
			[[Category:Related_Organisations]]

Dummy User: update URL

2009-09-24T20:44:15Z

update URL

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 24 September 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	In June 2007 YSTV came 49th (out of 50) in the annual Vision power list. No-one seems to know quite why this happened but it certainly marks a turnaround in relations between the two societies.		In June 2007 YSTV came 49th (out of 50) in the annual Vision power list. No-one seems to know quite why this happened but it certainly marks a turnaround in relations between the two societies.

	http://~~vision~~.~~york~~.ac.uk/		http://www.yorkvision.co.uk/

Jonathan: Added power list ref

2007-07-09T13:34:45Z

Added power list ref

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 9 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].		Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].

	In the ~~late 90s/~~early ~~00s~~ the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by a nasty leader comment about YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.		In the early 2000s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by a nasty leader comment about YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.

	In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] and [[Nouse]] also suffered at their hands.		In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] and [[Nouse]] also suffered at their hands.

			In June 2007 YSTV came 49th (out of 50) in the annual Vision power list. No-one seems to know quite why this happened but it certainly marks a turnaround in relations between the two societies.

	http://vision.york.ac.uk/		http://vision.york.ac.uk/

Jonathan at 14:48, 27 May 2007

2007-05-27T14:48:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 27 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].		Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].

	In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.		In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by a nasty leader comment about YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.

	In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] and [[Nouse]] also suffered at their hands.		In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] and [[Nouse]] also suffered at their hands.

			http://vision.york.ac.uk/

Jonathan at 14:39, 27 May 2007

2007-05-27T14:39:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 27 May 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.		In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.

	In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] also suffered at their hands.		In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] and [[Nouse]] also suffered at their hands.

Jonathan: Correcting my own spelling

2007-05-27T14:37:27Z

Correcting my own spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 27 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].		Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].

	In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by ~~questing~~ the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.		In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision, YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questioning the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.

	In recent years Vision ~~have~~ been ~~much kinder~~, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] also suffered at their hands.		In recent years Vision has been more concilliatory, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] also suffered at their hands.

Jonathan at 14:36, 27 May 2007

2007-05-27T14:36:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 27 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].		Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].

	In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really ~~had~~ a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "Clock Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision).		In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really seemed to have a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "[[Clock]] Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" YUSU budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision). This led to a letter from [[Dave Baker]] (but largely penned by [[Jonathan Bufton]]) pointing out this fact, and also that the money had led to a number of awards at [[NaSTA]] - but unlike Vision YSTV didn't shout about its success quite as much. Predictably Vision then retaliated by questing the value of [[NaSTA]] awards...and so it interminably went on.

			In recent years Vision have been much kinder, even reporting the station's success from time to time. This may be due to the launch of the [[Video Server]] and online programming (and the dropping of all simulcasting) making YSTV's output easier to see, or it may just have been a fairly nasty period in the paper's history - [[URY]] also suffered at their hands.

Jonathan: Vision page

2007-05-27T14:30:25Z

Vision page

New page

Also known as York Vision, launched around 1986 as a more populist alternative to [[Nouse]].

In the late 90s/early 00s the paper really had a problem with YSTV, variously referring to it as "Minority Geek Soc" and "Clock Soc", and for many years running a spoof YSTV listings column headed by a picture of [[The Simpsons]]. In particular in 2003/4 there was an clash between the two sparked by YSTV's "generous" budget allocation (actually around £1000 less than Vision).