Talk:Children In Need - Revision history

Dummy User: Caps now!

2007-02-26T19:59:06Z

Caps now!

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 26 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]		How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]

	If you linked it like [[Children in Need]] ([[Children in Need 2004\|2004]], [[Children in Need 2005\|2005]]) that'd work fine. We could even have another 'footer' (like the Officers' footer) with all the years listed in it... [[User:Rick\|Rick]] 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)		If you linked it like [[Children In Need]] ([[Children In Need 2004\|2004]], [[Children In Need 2005\|2005]]) that'd work fine. We could even have another 'footer' (like the Officers' footer) with all the years listed in it... [[User:Rick\|Rick]] 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Dummy User: Talk:Children in Need moved to Talk:Children In Need: Capitalization. Keep consistancy.

2007-02-26T16:51:53Z

Talk:Children in Need moved to Talk:Children In Need: Capitalization. Keep consistancy.

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:51, 26 February 2007
(No difference)

Dummy User: lower case i's?

2007-02-26T14:17:16Z

lower case i's?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 26 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]		How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]

	If you linked it like [[Children In Need]] ([[Children In Need 2004\|2004]], [[Children In Need 2005\|2005]]) that'd work fine. We could even have another 'footer' (like the Officers' footer) with all the years listed in it... [[User:Rick\|Rick]] 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)		If you linked it like [[Children in Need]] ([[Children in Need 2004\|2004]], [[Children in Need 2005\|2005]]) that'd work fine. We could even have another 'footer' (like the Officers' footer) with all the years listed in it... [[User:Rick\|Rick]] 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Dummy User at 14:17, 26 February 2007

2007-02-26T14:17:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 26 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]		How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]]

			If you linked it like [[Children In Need]] ([[Children In Need 2004\|2004]], [[Children In Need 2005\|2005]]) that'd work fine. We could even have another 'footer' (like the Officers' footer) with all the years listed in it... [[User:Rick\|Rick]] 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan: New page: How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as...

2007-02-26T14:10:48Z

New page: How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as...

New page

How do people think we should we sort the pages for each year's entry to annual/events coverage programmes? Whilst stuff that doesn't change an awful lot like BoB could probably all go as sub-headings in one article, Elections and possibly CIN could become very long articles indeed and I think they deserve seperate entries for each year under a generic page, like I've done for CIN. This would mean that lots of different years for each show would appear on the productions page though. I do prefer the latter though... [[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]]